Definitely about outliers

I have always been an outlier. From a small town and yearning to be in a city. Coming from an environment that was fairly conservative, but having ideas that were not. Entering the world of art, but not fitting in. Moving on a career path that is not a straight and logical course but one with sharp turns and bumps. But definitely an outlier.

I am working on an audit right now that is also about outliers. But we are looking for outliers because this will provide evidence to evaluate whether management has done its job. What is managements' job? Is it managements' job to make employees all conform?

The real measure for an employer is the quality of the work. Employees may have differing work styles but the work quality may be worth accommodating those styles. That is why an audit should focus on effect. If accommodating different styles does not create a negative effect or actually increases effectiveness, than auditors should be tolerant of outliers in their analysis.

Outliers can also be a symptom of a problem that needs to be addressed. Rather than try to control the outlier, management instead should use it as information about organizational health. When an auditor finds this type of outlier, she can use the information to describe the effect of an organizational problem. Recommendations then would focus on the real problem, not employees who are outliers.